It is hard to take a winter storm named Cleon or Dion -- or Nemo -- seriously. It is not that I do not take winter storms seriously. I do. I just find it hard to take seriously some of the names the Weather Channel assigns these winter storms.
(I actually blame the Latin class at Bozeman High School in Bozeman, Montana. Zephyr, guys? Really? Do you even know what zephyr means? For those too lazy to look it up, it means "soft, gentle breeze." Sheesh. Also, what is with all the rhyming names this year? Cleon, Dion, Leon... Ion, Orion... Janus, Maximus, Quintus....)
Look, I get it's easier to talk about a particular storm if you give it a name, like we do hurricanes. But Weather Channel (and you know we love you), you can do better than this:
Personally, I think every storm should be called Khan (last year's K storm, which wasn't much of a storm), or something appropriately wrathful, or violent, or unpredictable.
I know, how about naming winter storms after football players, or wrestlers, or tantrum-throwing celebrities? (Snow storm Alec or Lindsay anyone?)
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
No, no, no, no, no, no, NO.
(Oh mama mia mama mia -- sorry.)
Winter storms are NOT named, therefore the question of whether their names are cool (ha) or not is moot. This whole naming BS is a ratings ploy by the Weather Channel and it makes me genuinely angry.
Now get off my lawn, but make a snow angel first.
Post a Comment